Skip to main content
Research/Flagship Reports
Published July 202653 pagesNoveleader · Francesco · Kaiko Research Team

The Verticalisation Thesis: How Blockchain Revenue Models Are Evolving

Covering the expansion of revenue streams by blockchains

Data snapshot: July 2026. Figures are preserved from the published report; charts marked updated daily use live data.

“The old business model of selling blockspace is not enough to justify the high valuations of multiple blockchains.”

▮ The numbers that matter

$9.91B
Ethereum chain fees at the 2021 peak
-94.7%
Ethereum fee compression from 2021 to 2025
$881M
Hyperliquid perp DEX fees over the past year
$1B+
Hyperliquid fees generated in the last 12 months
$24M
HIP-3 revenue contribution since launch
$48B
Combined TVL across Ethereum, Tron, Solana, and Hyperliquid

Executive Summary

Blockchains began as businesses that sold blockspace, but cheaper execution, rollup scaling, and competition from faster chains have compressed that revenue stream. The report maps the shift from horizontal ecosystems that rent neutral infrastructure to verticalised chains that own high-value primitives directly. Hyperliquid is the clearest proof point: the chain captures exchange, builder, market-deployer, priority-fee, and stablecoin-alignment revenue rather than relying on gas fees alone.

Key findings

  1. 01Ethereum chain fees fell from $9.91 billion in 2021 to $523 million in 2025, a 94.7% decline as execution and rollup settlement became cheaper.
  2. 02Hyperliquid generated more than $1 billion in fees over the previous 12 months, including $881 million from its perpetual DEX and about $24 million from HIP-3.
  3. 03Ethereum, Tron, Solana and Hyperliquid held a combined $48 billion in TVL, but the report found revenue aligned more closely with transaction and stablecoin settlement than with TVL alone.

Covered in the report

EthereumArbitrumAvalancheSolanaHyperliquidTradeXYZBaseBSCMantleInkPlasmaMegaETHRobinhood ChainTempoTron

Inside

  1. 01Introduction
  2. 02The Decline of Blockchain Revenue
  3. 03Selling Blockspace is No Longer Enough
  4. 04The Case for Verticalisation: Hyperliquid
  5. 05Growing Exchange Chains
  6. 06The Case for New Chains
  7. 07Are most blockchains overvalued?
  8. 08Conclusion

Why Blockchain Revenue Is Falling

Most chains make money by selling blockspace: users pay gas to get their transactions executed. That product has turned into a commodity. Blockspace from competing L1s, L2s and blockspace-as-a-product providers is interchangeable for most uses, competition keeps pushing fees down, and the most successful apps now earn more than the chains they run on.

In 2021 Ethereum earned $9.91 billion in chain fees, about $826 million a month at the peak, and its chain fees were 1.94 times the fees of every app on it combined. The rollup-centric roadmap then moved activity to L2s, and the Dencun upgrade in 2024 cut L2 transaction costs by 10x with blobs, which also cut what the L1 earns.

Chain Blockspace Revenue

Annual chain fees by network, log scale

  • Ethereum
  • Solana
  • Arbitrum
  • Avalanche
$100K$1M$10M$100M$1B$10B202120222023202420252026 YTD

Source: DefiLlama · Data to 1 Nov 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
EthereumSolanaArbitrumAvalanche
2021$9.91B$28.02M$16.86Mn/a
2022$4.3B$26.46M$21.84M$735K
2023$2.41B$23.49M$65.58M$63.49M
2024$2.47B$713M$42.94M$17.9M
2025$523M$645M$18.2M$8.35M
2026 YTD$149M$197M$5.03M$1.89M

Now, 1 Nov 2026Ethereum chain fees 2026 to date: $149M

In the report, July 2026On a log scale, Solana is the only network whose fees held up in 2025. Ethereum, Arbitrum and Avalanche all sit far below their peaks.

Report page 11

Chain fees at the peak and in 2025

NetworkPeak chain fees2025 chain feesChange
Ethereum$9.91B (2021)$523MDown 94.7% in four years
Arbitrum$65.6M (2023)$18.2MTimeboost now adds a second revenue line
Avalanche$63.5M (2023)$8.4MDown 86.8%
Solana$713M (2024)$645MDown 9.6%, held up by memecoin and DeFi trading

Source: DefiLlama data in Castle Labs and Kaiko Research, The Verticalisation Thesis (July 2026)

Apps keep growing while chain fees shrink. Over the 30 days to June 2026, application fees on Ethereum, Solana, Base, Arbitrum and Avalanche were far larger than the chain fees each network earned.

How Hyperliquid Makes Money

Hyperliquid is the chain and the main app at the same time. Instead of renting blockspace to outside exchanges, it runs the perp DEX itself and keeps the fees, most of which go to buying back HYPE. It made about $960 million in protocol fees in 2025 and over $1 billion in the last 12 months, which puts it among the largest fee earners in crypto after Tether and Circle.

The perp DEX earned $881 million over the past year, against $10.4 million from HyperEVM gas. Inside the trading engine, perp fees are about 88% of gross revenue, builder-code distribution about 9% and spot fees about 2%. Each new product adds another line that Hyperliquid takes a cut of.

Hyperliquid Revenue Source: Perp DEX vs Chain

Weekly share of revenue

  • Perp DEX
  • Chain (HyperEVM gas)
0%50%100%Mar '25Jul '25Nov '25Mar '26Jul '26Report data, Jul 2026

Source: DefiLlama · Data to week of 19 Oct 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DatePerp DEXChain (HyperEVM gas)
3 Aug 202698.8%1.2%
10 Aug 202699.2%0.8%
17 Aug 202695.8%4.2%
24 Aug 202698.1%1.9%
31 Aug 202698.6%1.4%
7 Sep 202698.9%1.1%
14 Sep 202699.2%0.8%
21 Sep 202699.3%0.7%
28 Sep 202699.3%0.7%
5 Oct 202698.7%1.3%
12 Oct 202699.3%0.7%
19 Oct 202699.5%0.5%

Now, week of 19 Oct 2026Chain share last week: 0.5%

In the report, July 2026HyperEVM gas is a rounding error next to the exchange: 1.2% of Hyperliquid's revenue on average and about 2% at its peak.

Report page 19

Hyperliquid revenue lines, July 2026

Revenue lineHow it worksWhat it has earned or done
Perp DEXHyperliquid's own exchange; most fees fund HYPE buybacks$881M over the past year; weekly totals of $10M to $30M
HyperEVM gasBlockspace sold to apps on the chain$10.4M over the past year; 1.2% of revenue on average, about 2% at peak
HIP-3 marketsDeployers stake at least 500K HYPE to list their own perps and share 50% of the revenueAbout $24M since launch; TradeXYZ markets are over 30% of Hyperliquid open interest, peaking near $3B
Builder codesOutside frontends add their own fee on top of base feesOver 25 active codes; $76M lifetime revenue for builders since October 2024; 5% to 10% of volume
HIP-4 outcome marketsBinary options; deployers stake 1M HYPE; no fees during testing, then 50% to HyperliquidLive since May 2026; over $250M in volume
Priority feesTraders pay a small fee for lower-latency order processingLive since April 2026; about $4M so far
USDC reserve share (AQAv2)USDC is the designated quote asset and shares 90% of its reserve income with HyperliquidAn extra $130M to $150M a year

Source: Castle Labs and Kaiko Research, The Verticalisation Thesis (July 2026)

HIP-3 shows how the model works in practice. TradeXYZ listed perps on the S&P 500, TSLA, NVDA and other traditional assets, and after the first strike on Iran on 28 February 2026, Hyperliquid was the only venue trading crude oil with active price discovery. Hyperliquid did not list those markets, but it handled distribution and kept a share of the revenue. The biggest builder-code earners are Phantom ($22M), BasedApp ($15M) and pvp.trade ($8M).

Base vs BSC vs Mantle vs Ink: Why Exchanges Run Their Own Chains

Binance, Coinbase, Bybit and Kraken all run or incubate their own chains, and the sequencer fee is not why. A chain gives the exchange its own onchain distribution, keeps the DeFi revenue that follows its users, and gives its balance-sheet products a place to settle that it controls.

Chain performance tracks the parent exchange, not the technology. The ranking of BSC, Base, Mantle and Ink by TVL, users and revenue mirrors the ranking of their parents by exchange volume almost exactly.

Revenue per Exchange Chain

Monthly chain revenue

  • Base
  • BSC
  • Mantle
  • Ink
-$10M$0$10M$20M$30M20222023202420252026Report data, Jul 2026

Source: DefiLlama · Data to Oct 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DateBaseBSCMantleInk
Nov 2025$6.17M$1.46M$27.08K$18.39K
Dec 2025$2.74M$1.47M$23.14K$10.68K
Jan 2026$5.61M$2.02M$19.55K$15.7K
Feb 2026$8.14M$833K$16.34K$14.13K
Mar 2026$3.16M$1.06M$18.11K$12.31K
Apr 2026$2.71M$1.01M$27.53K$11.47K
May 2026$3.86M$1.02M$27.99K$12.71K
Jun 2026$4.15M$1.09M$7.74K$28.92K
Jul 2026$2.06M$903K$4.96K$7.57K
Aug 2026$3.02M$1.84M$7.3K$20.79K
Sep 2026$4.69M$2.18M$12.58K$28.73K
Oct 2026$2.54M$1.38M$8.79K$19.34K

Now, Oct 2026Base: $2.54M · BSC: $1.38M · Mantle: $8.79K · Ink: $19.34K

In the report, July 2026Base is one of only two major chains whose revenue grew over the past year, up 26% to about $182K a day. Mantle and Ink barely register.

Report page 31

Exchange chains compared, July 2026

ChainParentRevenue over the past yearHow it makes money
BaseCoinbase$64.0M; up 26%, from about $144K to $182K a dayNo token and no DAO; stopped sharing fees with Optimism, so Coinbase keeps 100% of sequencer revenue. Coinbase's onchain loan book settles through Morpho on Base.
BSCBinance$21.4M18.7M transactions a day at about $0.002 each. The chain keeps BNB useful as gas and collateral and keeps Binance's balance-sheet products onchain.
MantleBybit$0.5MmETH captures staking yield and MUSD anchors a stablecoin stack; $547M in stablecoins
InkKraken$0.2MClosest in design to Base but without a flagship integration yet; $222M in stablecoins

Source: Castle Labs and Kaiko Research, The Verticalisation Thesis (July 2026)

Mantle and Ink together hold about $300 million in TVL, less than a single mid-sized DeFi protocol, alongside nearly $800 million in stablecoins. The next year will show whether the exchange funnel turns into real chain revenue.

More Charts From the Report

13 charts from the 53-page PDF on this page, each with the number that matters.

Chain Fees vs Application Fees

Trailing 30 days

  • Application fees
  • Chain fees
$0$100M$200M$300M$400MEthereumSolanaBaseArbitrumAvalanche

Source: DefiLlama · Data to 1 Nov 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
Application feesChain fees
Ethereum$386M$22.11M
Solana$372M$22.01M
Base$50.39M$2.47M
Arbitrum$18.19M$595K
Avalanche$8.75M$349K

Now, 1 Nov 2026Apps on Ethereum, 30 days: $386M · Ethereum chain fees, 30 days: $22.11M

In the report, July 2026On every network shown, the apps earn far more than the chain. In 2021 it was the other way round: Ethereum's chain fees were 1.94 times its application fees.

Report page 12

Hyperliquid Revenue

Weekly protocol revenue

$0$10M$20M$30M$40MFeb '25Jun '25Oct '25Feb '26Jun '26Oct '26Report data, Jul 2026

Source: DefiLlama · Data to week of 19 Oct 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DateRevenue
3 Aug 2026$6.44M
10 Aug 2026$6.14M
17 Aug 2026$24.41M
24 Aug 2026$20.67M
31 Aug 2026$16.34M
7 Sep 2026$15.5M
14 Sep 2026$19.33M
21 Sep 2026$18.74M
28 Sep 2026$14.65M
5 Oct 2026$14.39M
12 Oct 2026$16.41M
19 Oct 2026$14.74M

Now, week of 19 Oct 2026Revenue last week: $14.74M

In the report, July 2026Weekly revenue ranges from $10 million to $30 million. Perp fees are about 88% of gross revenue, builder-code distribution about 9% and spot fees about 2%.

Report page 19

Hyperliquid Monthly Protocol Fees

Monthly fees, from December 2024

$0$50M$100M$150MDec '24Apr '25Aug '25Dec '25Apr '26Aug '26Report data, Jul 2026

Source: DefiLlama · Data to Oct 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DateProtocol fees
Nov 2025$101M
Dec 2025$68.75M
Jan 2026$77.29M
Feb 2026$70.7M
Mar 2026$69.49M
Apr 2026$58.67M
May 2026$62.18M
Jun 2026$80.98M
Jul 2026$55.14M
Aug 2026$77.77M
Sep 2026$91.33M
Oct 2026$87.95M

Now, Oct 2026Fees last month: $87.95M · Last 12 months: $900M

In the report, July 2026Over $1 billion in fees in the last 12 months, which puts Hyperliquid among the largest fee earners in crypto after Tether and Circle.

Report page 24

HIP-3 xyz:CL (Crude Oil) Volume

Weekly notional volume on TradeXYZ's oil perp

$0$2B$4B$6B$8BMar '26May '26Jul '26Sep '26Report data, Jul 2026

Source: Hyperliquid API · Data to week of 19 Oct 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DateVolume
3 Aug 2026$1.77B
10 Aug 2026$1.05B
17 Aug 2026$719M
24 Aug 2026$879M
31 Aug 2026$1.73B
7 Sep 2026$1.99B
14 Sep 2026$1.49B
21 Sep 2026$1.48B
28 Sep 2026$1.19B
5 Oct 2026$1.02B
12 Oct 2026$911M
19 Oct 2026$1.4B

Now, week of 19 Oct 2026Volume last week: $1.4B

In the report, July 2026Volume on TradeXYZ's crude oil perp jumped after the first strike on Iran on 28 February 2026, when Hyperliquid was the only venue trading oil with active price discovery. HIP-3 has added about $24 million to Hyperliquid's revenue.

Report page 26

Arbitrum Timeboost Revenue

Cumulative and daily revenue since the April 2025 launch

  • Cumulative revenue
  • Daily revenue
Cumulative revenue$0$2M$4M$6M$8MDaily revenue$0$20K$40K$60K$80KMay '25Aug '25Nov '25Feb '26May '26Aug '26Report data, Jul 2026

Source: DefiLlama · Data to 31 Oct 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DateCumulative revenueDaily revenue
20 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
21 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
22 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
23 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
24 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
25 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
26 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
27 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
28 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
29 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
30 Oct 2026$7.74M$0
31 Oct 2026$7.74M$0

Now, 31 Oct 2026Revenue since launch: $7.74M

In the report, July 2026Timeboost has made about $7.5 million since April 2025, roughly half of the $13.2 million Arbitrum earned as a chain over the past year. Arbitrum's daily revenue still fell about 40% over the year.

Report page 20

Plasma TVL vs XPL Price

Daily, from September 2025

  • Plasma TVL
  • XPL price
Plasma TVL$0$2B$4B$6B$8BXPL price$0$0.1$0.2$0.3$0.4Oct '25Jan '26Apr '26Jul '26Oct '26Report data, Jul 2026

Source: DefiLlama, CoinGecko · Data to 1 Nov 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DatePlasma TVLXPL price
21 Oct 2026$571M$0.08
22 Oct 2026$568M$0.08
23 Oct 2026$557M$0.08
24 Oct 2026$560M$0.08
25 Oct 2026$561M$0.07
26 Oct 2026$563M$0.07
27 Oct 2026$548M$0.07
28 Oct 2026$540M$0.07
29 Oct 2026$552M$0.08
30 Oct 2026$512M$0.07
31 Oct 2026$495M$0.08
1 Nov 2026$513M$0.08

Now, 1 Nov 2026Plasma TVL: $513M · XPL: $0.08

In the report, July 2026Plasma's TVL peaked at $10 billion around launch and fell to $1.78 billion as the XPL incentives lost value. The chain earned $3.7K in fees in June, 95% below its peak.

Report page 36

L1 Revenue per Chain

Monthly revenue

  • Ethereum
  • Hyperliquid
  • Solana
  • Tron
$0$500M$1B$1.5B$2B202120222023202420252026Report data, Jul 2026

Source: DefiLlama · Data to Oct 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DateEthereumHyperliquidSolanaTron
Nov 2025$7.81M$77.65M$2.91M$29.42M
Dec 2025$1.87M$51.21M$2.49M$30.65M
Jan 2026$3.09M$59.84M$2.74M$29.1M
Feb 2026$3.15M$54M$1.75M$24.34M
Mar 2026$1.81M$51.51M$1.94M$29.25M
Apr 2026$8.73M$42.36M$1.66M$30.52M
May 2026$5.28M$46.33M$1.75M$32.23M
Jun 2026$2.98M$59.96M$1.47M$26.99M
Jul 2026$2.05M$38.42M$1.68M$27.42M
Aug 2026$2.51M$61.36M$2.11M$26.52M
Sep 2026$4.88M$74.19M$2.91M$23.85M
Oct 2026$7.67M$69.13M$2.73M$24.91M

Now, Oct 2026Ethereum: $7.67M · Hyperliquid: $69.13M · Solana: $2.73M · Tron: $24.91M

In the report, July 2026The four chains earned $1.64 billion in November 2021, almost all of it on Ethereum. In 2026 they average $80 million a month, and Ethereum earned $5.3 million in May 2026, 0.3% of its peak.

Report page 42

TVL per Chain

Weekly total value locked

  • Ethereum
  • Hyperliquid
  • Solana
  • Tron
$0$50B$100B$150B202120222023202420252026Report data, Jul 2026

Source: DefiLlama · Data to week of 26 Oct 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DateEthereumHyperliquidSolanaTron
10 Aug 2026$41.37B$1.22B$4.78B$4.8B
17 Aug 2026$48.88B$1.52B$5.53B$5.21B
24 Aug 2026$49.19B$1.55B$5.88B$5.25B
31 Aug 2026$49.51B$1.52B$5.87B$5.43B
7 Sep 2026$49.95B$2.47B$5.86B$5.5B
14 Sep 2026$52.46B$2.67B$6.13B$5.58B
21 Sep 2026$53.42B$2.74B$6.57B$5.65B
28 Sep 2026$53.16B$2.64B$6.47B$5.67B
5 Oct 2026$51.27B$2.64B$6.16B$5.71B
12 Oct 2026$49.36B$2.44B$5.88B$5.58B
19 Oct 2026$48.96B$2.38B$5.76B$5.49B
26 Oct 2026$44.17B$2.63B$5.4B$5.36B

Now, week of 26 Oct 2026Ethereum: $44.17B · Hyperliquid: $2.63B · Solana: $5.4B · Tron: $5.36B

In the report, July 2026The four chains hold $48 billion in TVL, $37.5 billion of it on Ethereum, which earned $118 million over the past year. Hyperliquid, the biggest earner, has the smallest TVL at $1.5 billion.

Report page 44

Stablecoin Market Cap per Chain

Weekly stablecoin supply

  • Ethereum
  • Tron
  • Solana
  • Hyperliquid
$0$100B$200B$300B202120222023202420252026Report data, Jul 2026

Source: DefiLlama · Data to week of 26 Oct 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
DateEthereumTronSolanaHyperliquid
10 Aug 2026$146B$90.87B$15.58B$6.19B
17 Aug 2026$146B$91.78B$15.96B$6.86B
24 Aug 2026$146B$92.24B$15.78B$6.86B
31 Aug 2026$147B$92.6B$16.44B$7.02B
7 Sep 2026$146B$93B$16.28B$6.9B
14 Sep 2026$146B$92.81B$15.56B$7.26B
21 Sep 2026$146B$92.79B$16.56B$7.66B
28 Sep 2026$145B$94.3B$16.64B$7.43B
5 Oct 2026$145B$94.93B$16.15B$7.24B
12 Oct 2026$145B$94.53B$15.83B$7.02B
19 Oct 2026$144B$94.09B$15.85B$6.91B
26 Oct 2026$141B$93.88B$15.43B$6.69B

Now, week of 26 Oct 2026Ethereum: $141B · Tron: $93.88B · Solana: $15.43B · Hyperliquid: $6.69B

In the report, July 2026The four chains hold $270 billion in stablecoins, 92% of it on Ethereum ($158B) and Tron ($90.1B). The chains that settle the most stablecoin flow earn the most: Tron's transfer fees bring in $444 million a year.

Report page 45

P/S Ratio per Chain

Market cap divided by revenue over the past 12 months

0x1Kx2Kx3Kx4Kx5Kx6KxHyperliquidTronSolanaEthereum

Source: DefiLlama, CoinGecko · Data to 1 Nov 2026 · Updated daily

Castle Labs
View the data
P/S ratio
Hyperliquid31x
Tron88x
Solana2.15Kx
Ethereum5.33Kx

Now, 1 Nov 2026Hyperliquid: 31x · Tron: 88x · Solana: 2.15Kx · Ethereum: 5.33Kx

In the report, July 2026Hyperliquid trades at 16x sales and Tron at 67x. Solana at 1,078x and Ethereum at 1,701x only make sense if the market prices them as money rather than as claims on cash flow.

Report page 47

Get every chart in the full report →

Method and Data Boundary

Castle and Kaiko compare chain fees, application fees, TVL, stablecoin balances and product-level revenue across established and new networks. The report uses Hyperliquid as the main verticalisation case study, then tests the thesis against exchange chains, L2s and purpose-built networks.

Published
July 2026
Data snapshot
July 2026

Data From the Report

New verticalised chains, July 2026

ChainVertical betKey figures
PlasmaL1 for stablecoin payments: zero-fee USDT transfers without holding XPL, plus the Plasma One card for spending at Visa merchantsTVL peaked at $10B around launch and stands at $1.78B; $3.7K in chain fees in June, 95% below peak
MegaETHOwn stablecoin, USDm, issued with Ethena, with reserve income funding MEGA buybacksUSDm market cap about $230M, implying $8M to $9M a year in buybacks at a 3.6% to 3.7% SOFR
Robinhood ChainArbitrum-stack L2 for tokenised traditional assets that Robinhood itself issuesLive since the start of July 2026; TVL $175M; Robinhood Earn vault on Morpho, curated by Steakhouse, targets 7% APY on a $140M market
TempoEnterprise chain for stablecoin payments, incubated by Stripe and ParadigmGas paid in the stablecoin being sent; Zones privacy for institutions; targets Shopify merchants, DoorDash drivers, Klarna instalments and treasury flows

Source: Castle Labs and Kaiko Research, The Verticalisation Thesis (July 2026)

TVL, stablecoins, revenue and valuation of four L1s

ChainTVLStablecoinsRevenueP/S ratio (12 June 2026)
Ethereum$37.5B$158B$118M over the past year; $5.3M in May 2026, 0.3% of its peak1,701x
Tron$4.3B$90.1B$444M annualised; $30M to $75M a month for several years67x
Solana$4.6B$15.8BPeaked at $121M a month in January 2025, at the height of memecoin trading1,078x
Hyperliquid$1.5B$6.3BLargest of the four; peaked at $119M in August 2025, now $30M to $50M a month16x

Source: Kaiko and DefiLlama data in Castle Labs and Kaiko Research, The Verticalisation Thesis (July 2026)

Questions This Report Answers

What is blockchain verticalisation?
A chain growing by owning one high-value product or revenue stream instead of renting blockspace to many outside apps. A horizontal chain earns gas on whatever apps it attracts. A vertical chain is the app, or is tightly tied to one, so it keeps a much bigger share of the activity it enables. Hyperliquid, which runs its own perp DEX, is the clearest example.
Why are blockchain fees falling?
Blockspace became a commodity. Competing L1s, L2s and blockspace providers are interchangeable for most uses, the race for cheaper transactions pushed fees down, and the Dencun upgrade in 2024 moved rollup data into near-free blob space. Ethereum's chain fees fell from $9.91 billion in 2021 to $523 million in 2025, a 94.7% drop.
How does Hyperliquid make money?
Mostly from its own perp DEX, which earned $881 million over the past year against $10.4 million from HyperEVM gas. It also takes 50% of HIP-3 market revenue (about $24 million since launch), earns from builder codes and priority fees (about $4 million since April 2026), and receives 90% of the reserve income on USDC used on the platform, worth an extra $130 million to $150 million a year. Most fees go to HYPE buybacks.
What is HIP-3 on Hyperliquid?
HIP-3 lets anyone deploy their own perp markets on Hyperliquid by staking at least 500,000 HYPE, in exchange for sharing 50% of the revenue with the protocol. TradeXYZ used it to list perps on the S&P 500, TSLA, NVDA and crude oil, and its markets grew to over 30% of Hyperliquid's open interest, peaking near $3 billion. HIP-4 applies the same model to outcome markets with a 1 million HYPE stake.
What is Arbitrum Timeboost and how much has it made?
Timeboost is an auction for transaction priority that the Arbitrum DAO introduced in April 2025. It has generated about $7.5 million in fees, roughly half of the $13.2 million Arbitrum earned as a chain over the past year. Arbitrum's daily revenue still fell about 40% over the year, so we see Timeboost as a bolt-on that cannot offset cheaper blockspace on its own.
Why do exchanges like Coinbase and Binance run their own chains?
To own onchain distribution, not to sell blockspace. A chain lets the exchange keep the DeFi revenue its users generate and settle its own balance-sheet products. Base earned $64.0 million over the past year and Coinbase keeps all of it; BSC processes 18.7 million transactions a day at about $0.002 each to keep BNB useful. Each chain's results track its parent's exchange volume.
Are most blockchains overvalued?
On fee income, most are. As of 12 June 2026, Hyperliquid traded at 16 times sales and Tron at 67 times, while Solana traded at 1,078 times and Ethereum at 1,701 times. Those last two only make sense if the market values ETH and SOL as money rather than as claims on cash flow. Because HYPE buybacks tie the token to revenue, Hyperliquid's valuation is the most defensible of the group.